Article
Red Flag Warnings Are Helpful but Not the Whole Story
They warn of fire spread, but electric utilities need to know where fires will start.

They warn of fire spread, but electric utilities need to know where fires will start.
Red Flag Warnings are a familiar part of wildfire season for anyone working in electric utility operations. When the National Weather Service issues one, it signals that weather conditions are favorable for fire spread: low humidity, dry fuels, and often strong winds. For the general public, that warning is important and actionable. For electric utility risk managers, it is a starting point, not a finish line.
The gap between what a Red Flag Warning tells you and what you actually need to know to protect your infrastructure is where the real risk lives.
Spread vs. Start: Why the Difference Matters
Red Flag Warnings are primarily designed to communicate conditions that allow existing fires to spread rapidly. That is valuable information, but it addresses a different problem than the one utilities are most responsible for managing.
An electric utility’s core concern is ignition. Specifically, whether one of its assets could start a fire. And the conditions that create ignition risk at the circuit level do not always align with the conditions that drive a Red Flag Warning. An asset failure during moderate wind on a day with critically dry fuels and low humidity can spark a fire just as devastating as one that starts under headline-grabbing conditions. Basing operational decisions solely on whether a Red Flag Warning has been issued can lead to both overreaction on broad, low-specificity warning days and underreaction on days where localized ignition risk is genuinely elevated but the warning threshold has not been met.
For utilities of any size, that mismatch carries real consequences. A cooperative serving a rural territory with limited crew resources cannot afford to deploy broadly on every warning day, nor can it afford to miss the days that actually matter.
The Hidden Complexity of Dry Lightning
One of the clearest examples of where Red Flag Warnings fall short for utility operations is dry lightning. Dry lightning, lightning that strikes without significant accompanying rainfall, sits within the Red Flag Warning framework but represents a fundamentally different risk profile than wind and humidity driven warnings.
When dry lightning is the primary hazard, the concern is not one ignition spreading rapidly. It is the potential for numerous simultaneous ignitions across a wide area, any one of which could overwhelm response resources regardless of wind speed. That scenario requires a completely different operational response, including different crew positioning, different communication protocols, and different decisions about de-energization. Treating a dry lightning warning the same way as a wind-driven Red Flag Warning leaves utilities underprepared for one of the more dangerous ignition scenarios they can face.
What Granular Risk Intelligence Provides
The operational gap created by broad public warnings can be closed with more precise, localized risk data. Rather than asking “is there a Red Flag Warning today,” utility risk managers benefit most from asking where, specifically within their service territory, is ignition risk elevated, which assets are most exposed, and what conditions are driving that exposure.
Circuit-level risk intelligence, grounded in real-time weather data, fuel conditions, terrain analysis, and ignition modeling, gives utilities the specificity they need to make proportionate decisions. That means a smaller utility can deploy its limited crews to the areas that actually need attention rather than spreading thin across a broad warning zone. It means a PSPS decision can be surgical rather than sweeping. And it means the reasoning behind every operational call is documented and defensible.
How to Move Beyond the Warning
Red Flag Warnings should remain part of every utility’s situational awareness. They are not the problem. The problem is treating them as sufficient on their own.
Utility risk managers can close the gap by training operations teams to ask deeper questions when warnings are issued: what type of warning is this, what specific conditions are driving it, and how does that map to actual exposure across our service territory? Supplementing public warnings with granular, utility-specific risk data turns a general alert into an actionable operational brief.
The utilities that manage wildfire risk most effectively are not the ones that react to warnings. They are the ones that already know what is happening in their territory before the warning is issued, and have a plan in place before conditions peak.